Build a useful investigation brief
Reconstruct the manifest
Record every artifact available at task start, its source, timestamp, revision, scope, and role in the prompt or evidence set. Compare the manifest with the intended freshness cutoff. Note missing current references and artifacts that were included without a stated date.
Diff current content
Obtain current counterparts where possible and compare schema, behavior, values, requirements, and ownership. Trace each material difference to claims, calculations, or recommendations in the result. Preserve both revisions and the comparison window so historical intent is not mistaken for current truth.
Replay one affected claim
Choose the highest-impact stale claim and evaluate it with current context while holding task wording and criteria constant. Compare conclusion, evidence, and uncertainty. If the result remains unchanged, record that finding; if it changes, identify the exact artifact boundary responsible.
What to carry forward
Produce a context investigation with execution manifest, current revisions, material diffs, affected claims, replay result, and tested explanations. Recommend a bounded refresh or historical label. Do not attribute the issue to collection timing when the evidence only shows that an old artifact was available.
Keep the decision with the work.
Use a Work Item in Aglet to record the problem, the evidence you have, and the next decision. Add an owner and priority, then keep updates in the discussion so the next person can follow the reasoning.
Create an account See the product workflow