Software work has no shortage of input. It needs a place to decide.
Aglet sits between the systems that report a problem and the work that changes it. It keeps the reason, owner, discussion, and result together.
Create accountThe hard part starts after the alert.
A team still has to decide whether a pattern deserves work, who should carry it, and what later observations say about the result. Aglet is built for that handoff.
Keep the signal specific. Keep the decision visible. Keep the result honest.
Three things the product keeps in view.
-
Patterns before tasks
Repeated production behavior and customer requests should keep their context instead of becoming a generic title.
-
Ownership before motion
Useful work has an owner, a reason, a discussion, and a review path before anyone asks for a change.
-
Results before confidence
A record should show what was tested and what the observations support, including when the answer is still unknown.
What Aglet does today.
Aglet is launching as a focused production service for the account-to-Work-Item path.
- In the product
- Projects, the included example, grouped Signals, ownership, comments, read-only integration context, agent records, and verification records.
- For teams
- Product and engineering teams that own software quality, delivery, and customer follow-up.
- Current focus
- Whether a problem-to-Work-Item record helps teams choose smaller, more useful changes.
- Kept explicit
- External collection and connections require setup. Repository and deployment writes stay off.
Try the workflow yourself.
Create an account, run the included example, and follow one problem into owned work.
Create account