Check whether the outcome improved
Check uncertainty structure
Assert the result names the decision, alternatives, evidence for and against each, unsupported claims, and current status. Require source, time, and scope for material artifacts. Mark vague phrases such as unclear or more data needed as failures unless they identify a specific boundary.
Reproduce the boundary
Run the smallest comparison or fixture used to justify uncertainty and verify that it produces indistinguishable or conflicting outcomes. Check supported conclusions that remain stable across alternatives. Record any discrepancy between the handoff and reproduced evidence.
Review next action
Confirm the proposed observation, owner, cutoff, expected discriminating result, and interim decision are explicit. Verify that a no-change outcome has a stopping rule. Retain the alternative matrix, evidence index, comparison output, and exact result revision.
What to carry forward
Accept the result when it states a real decision boundary, traceable evidence limits, stable supported claims, and a bounded next action or justified stopping point. Keep verification open for vague uncertainty or an unowned evidence request. Report which alternatives and observations were covered.
Keep the decision with the work.
Use a Work Item in Aglet to record the problem, the evidence you have, and the next decision. Add an owner and priority, then keep updates in the discussion so the next person can follow the reasoning.
Create an account See the product workflow