Keep the lesson for the next incident
Compare delay shapes
Align each episode by release, trigger, first occurrence, first detection, and recovery. Identify repeated intervals or conditions while keeping approximate matches labeled as hypotheses.
Preserve the right timestamps
Choose one or two timestamps that distinguish trigger from detection, such as job execution or data readiness. State their source and the decisions they support; avoid collecting every timestamp without a use.
Set a delayed recurrence rule
Define a future review when the same path remains quiet initially but changes after a known interval or condition. Name the owner, evidence window, and follow-up date for testing the lesson.
What to carry forward
The lesson should improve one timing comparison or trigger record and define delayed recurrence recognition. Treat it as a hypothesis until a later release or scheduled cycle shows that the new context arrives before attribution is lost. Keep one timestamp for trigger and one for detection in future records, then review a later scheduled cycle to see whether the new distinction improves attribution without collecting unrelated events.
Keep the decision with the work.
Use a Work Item in Aglet to record the problem, the evidence you have, and the next decision. Add an owner and priority, then keep updates in the discussion so the next person can follow the reasoning.
Create an account See the product workflow