Aglet

Prioritize Work From an Unclear Agent Brief

Prioritizing an unclear brief means deciding whether work can begin safely or whether clarification has higher value. Rank candidate interpretations by the decision they support, evidence already available, urgency, and cost of being wrong. Preserve ambiguity as a queue item instead of hiding it in execution.

Decide where the work belongs

  1. Rank decision value

    List the plausible decisions and the consequence of delaying or answering each incorrectly. Prefer a narrow interpretation that unlocks a concrete review when it matches the stated owner need. Keep broad discovery lower when no consumer or action is identified.

  2. Assess evidence readiness

    For each interpretation, record available sources, freshness, known gaps, and whether the result can be reproduced. Classify the next move as clarify the brief, gather a named input, investigate a bounded question, or defer pending authority. Do not treat silence as evidence.

  3. Set queue and trigger

    Choose one next action with owner, expected output, deadline or review point, and a trigger for widening or stopping. If clarification is needed, write the smallest question that resolves the queue choice. Keep alternate interpretations attached so later context can be evaluated.

What to carry forward

Return a queue decision that names the selected interpretation, decision value, evidence readiness, owner, and clarification or escalation trigger. Work may proceed only against the bounded interpretation. Mark the queue provisional when urgency or authority is asserted without supporting context.

Keep the decision with the work.

Use a Work Item in Aglet to record the problem, the evidence you have, and the next decision. Add an owner and priority, then keep updates in the discussion so the next person can follow the reasoning.

Create an account See the product workflow