Decide where the work belongs
Measure exposed harm
Estimate affected requests or users relative to the exposed cohort, and separate failed attempts from retries or duplicate reports. Identify whether the next rollout step would enlarge the population before treating expansion as safe.
Account for reversibility
Consider whether exposure can be held, narrowed, or compared with a stable control under existing release authority. Do not prescribe an unreviewed rollback. Record which safe decision points are available to the responsible owner.
Set a rollout checkpoint
Choose the next checkpoint at which evidence will be reviewed: before expansion, after a load threshold, or after a regional cycle. Name the result that permits progression and the result that requires investigation.
What to carry forward
Prioritization should leave the rollout at a named review point with a scoped owner and evidence rule. If cohort harm is low but comparison quality is poor, prioritize measurement rather than allowing aggregate health to stand in for confidence.
Keep the decision with the work.
Use a Work Item in Aglet to record the problem, the evidence you have, and the next decision. Add an owner and priority, then keep updates in the discussion so the next person can follow the reasoning.
Create an account See the product workflow