Aglet

Investigate dependency release across success and failure paths

Investigation should show which prerequisite state permits or blocks a dependent and whether a fan-in rule is evaluated from current records. Use the same dependency graph while varying one prerequisite outcome. Trace state projection, release event, dependent readiness, and terminal behavior at each edge.

Build a useful investigation brief

  1. Prepare prerequisite outcome cases

    Create sanitized graphs with all prerequisites succeeding, one failing, one canceled, one missing, and one delayed. Record the expected dependent state for each. Keep IDs and graph revision fixed so outcome mapping is the variable under test.

  2. Trace fan-in and release

    Capture prerequisite terminal events, dependency state projection, edge evaluation, release reason, dependent ready or wait record, and claim. Check whether one success can satisfy a rule that requires all prerequisites and whether stale state persists after a late event.

  3. Test one edge mapping

    Exercise one explicit edge or fan-in correction against the outcome matrix and compare dependent readiness and terminal states. Keep timeout behavior separate if it uses a different contract. Preserve a missing-prerequisite result rather than treating absence as success.

What to carry forward

Deliver the graph outcome matrix, edge and fan-in trace, first release divergence, and one tested mapping. State whether the next work belongs to prerequisite creation, state projection, release logic, timeout, or dependent handling. Keep delayed events and missing IDs explicit.

Technical background: Celery documentation.

Keep the decision with the work.

Use a Work Item in Aglet to record the problem, the evidence you have, and the next decision. Add an owner and priority, then keep updates in the discussion so the next person can follow the reasoning.

Create an account See the product workflow